CRYPTO NEWS

Bitcoin’s Mining Difficulty Rises for the First Time in 57 Days, BTC Hashrate Slipped 1.7% Lower in Q2

Bitcoin's Mining Difficulty Rises for the First Time in 57 Days, BTC Hashrate Slipped 1.7% Lower in Q2

The mining difficulty tied to the Bitcoin network increased for the first time in 57 days, rising 1.74% higher than the last two weeks. Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s hashrate has been below average as the network’s computational power is down 1.7% lower in the second quarter than in Q1 2022. After reaching 292 exahash per second (EH/s) on June 8, Bitcoin’s hashrate today is coasting along below the 200 EH/s mark at 182 EH/s.

Bitcoin’s Difficulty Increases, Making It More Difficult to Discover Block Rewards for the Next 2 Weeks

Following the three consecutive difficulty adjustment algorithm (DAA) reductions over the last six weeks, the DAA has shifted upwards for the first time since June 8. On August 4, at block height 747,936, the difficulty increased by 1.74%, bringing the metric up from 27.69 trillion to the current 28.20 trillion.

The DAA, or difficulty epoch, changes every 2,016 blocks or roughly every two weeks. The DAA increases when the 2,016 blocks are discovered too fast and the metric decreases when the discovery time is too slow. Satoshi Nakamoto’s design makes it so roughly every ten minutes, a new BTC block is found as the DAA system is modeled by a Poisson distribution scheme.

Since the 1.74% increase on Thursday, it is now harder to find a bitcoin block than it was during the last two weeks. Prior to the rise, the DAA shifted downwards three times in a row after June 8. Currently, the network’s 28.20 trillion difficulty metric is 9.76% lower than the all-time high in mid-May when it tapped 31.25 million.

With lower BTC prices and the latest difficulty increase, the changes could affect miners negatively during the next two weeks. At press time, the network’s computational power is under the 200 EH/s zone, as it’s coasting along at 182 EH/s today.

The overall Bitcoin hashrate slipped 1.7% lower in Q2 2022 compared to the first quarter, according to statistics compiled by stockapps.com’s fintech expert Edith Muthoni. “In the second half of the second quarter, Bitcoin’s overall hash rate grew more irregular and variable,” Muthoni notes in her research. “This behavior indicates miners are struggling to adapt to the changing market conditions.”

At 182 EH/s, Bitcoin’s hashrate is 37% lower than the 292 EH/s all-time high posted on June 8. Second quarter data indicates that Foundry USA was the top mining pool, capturing 22.27% of Q2’s overall hashrate. Foundry discovered 2,843 BTC blocks out of the 12,766 blocks found in Q2.

Antpool followed Foundry with 14.77% of the global hashrate as the pool discovered 1,885 blocks during the three-month period. The third largest mining pool in Q2 2022 was F2pool, with 14.31% of the global hashrate, as it mined 1,827 out of the 12,766 blocks discovered in the second quarter.

What do you think about Bitcoin’s difficulty rising 1.74% higher? Let us know your thoughts about this subject in the comments section below.

Utilizing and Monetizing existing NFTs using Magazine

I’m working on a side project, A Meta Magazine, featuring NFTs only. This is a collaborative project which utilizes existing NFTs. Entire Mag will be made out using NFTs, including cover pages, texture, images, and other media including text contents. Anyone can contribute to the Magazine if they own that particular NFT. Assuming Mag will::Listen

I’m working on a side project, A Meta Magazine, featuring NFTs only. This is a collaborative project which utilizes existing NFTs. Entire Mag will be made out using NFTs, including cover pages, texture, images, and other media including text contents. Anyone can contribute to the Magazine if they own that particular NFT.

Assuming Mag will have (X) supply with (Y) mint price resulting in (X*Y) Treasury Pool [ Ofc 100% sale liquidity will be diverted to the Treasury wallet ] Assuming there will be royalty rewards for secondary sales of the magazine (Z%) also pooled to the treasury wallet.

So theoretically the treasury wallet bears [ (X*Y) + (Z%) ] assets which can be used to reward contributors.

I’m unsure whether it’s practically viable or not and I am not a pro wrt Yielding and Rewards, So pardon my ignorance and correct me if I’m wrong. I need some serious suggestions regarding this since I’m stuck with this for a while. Every other aspect and feature has been sorted out except this.

I am curious to know whether this model is sustainable for the long term. Kindly shower some sparks to help a fellow Degen.

Bitcoin’s Mining Difficulty Rises for the First Time in 57 Days, BTC Hashrate Slipped 1.7% Lower in Q2

Shopping cart
There are no products in the cart!
Continue shopping
0